May be I was not clear. I agree with you, user effort is very important and
we should keep existing OSM data. However Geobase data will provide a very
very very good coverage and accuracy where no OSM data is available. The
use of Geobase data will allow the users to work locally to improve the
initial import and capture other features. For example, I import Geobase
data in Kamploops area
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.687&lon=-120.355&zoom=13) where I
kept the existing OSM data. You will see that Geobase help to cover the
area.
Michel
On Nov 20, 2008 11:04pm, Corey Burger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given most of the country has at least a few roads, we face a real
issue. The last thing we should be doing it ripping out a bunch of
mapping that somebody just added. So if we are going to rip out
exisiting stuff (and lets be honest, the effort of merging for some s
tuff just ain't worth it) then we should do a time stamp check to see
if the data was added within the past month or so. This prevents us
from dropping a whole load of data on a potential user that might get
really annoyed, as has happened in more than one case with the TIGER
data. To me, users are far far far more important than geobase data.
Corey
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 7:21 PM, wrote:
> I think the idea is not to replace existing OSM data. Therefore the
import
> should be able to insert only new data. I do not think we should exclude
> areas. We should detect the changes instead. Richard proposed to start
where
> osm data is not present. I agree with him.
>
> Michel
>
> On Nov 20, 2008 9:57pm, Corey Burger wrote:
>> On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 6:21 PM, Michel Gilbert wrote:
>>
>> > Hi osm users,
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Geobase National Road Network (NRN) datasets are available in shape
and
>> > GML
>>
>> > by provinces or Territories. So, I think we should plan the import by
>>
>> > provinces. Furthermore, we should base, the order of conversion, on
the
>>
>> > dataset content. In fact, there are three levels of NRN content:
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Roads with basic attributes : Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, New
>>
>> > Brunswick, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland, Northwest Territories
and
>>
>> > Nunavut Territory
>>
>> >
>>
>> > Roads with basic attributes + street & place names : British Columbia
>>
>>
>>
>> Both BC and NS have significant areas that have been mapped,
>>
>> specifically around Victoria, Vancouver and Halifax. Is the data going
>>
>> to be cut with a bounding box to exclude those areas? Are we just
>>
>> going to wipe out existing mapping?
>>
>>
>>
>> Corey
>>
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
