Hi Richard and all,
2008/11/28 Richard Weait <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Things I'd like to see from our collaboration with GeoBase. Some of > these things my be harder than others. But we can't get there if we > don't plan where we are going. I hope that you'll add your thoughts > here and in the wiki. Plan is very important, somehow we will have to translate the ideas into tasks, priorities then put them in a timeframe. > > > NRN added to OSM without clobbering OSM contributions. And in such a > way that future NRN updates are easier to incorporate to OSM than the > original import. As we mentioned in others threads, NRN is the more difficult theme to import. Geometry matching is a hard task and can't be fully automatic. The maintenance will be easier althougth the original osm will not be associated to any geobase id. > > Geographical names data base. Make generous use of the is_in tag to > help with indexing. > > Canadian boundary data in OSM. There is no reason for Canada to remain > an undifferentiated mass of maple syrup and poutine. Let's have > provincial (etc.) boundaries. Why don't we start with this one. It is light and easy to integrate. It will help to set the collaboration in phase ;). > > > Hey kid, want a WMS server? GeoBase has aerial imagery for us. In some > places it is higher resolution than current YWMS. If only we had a WMS > server to use it in our editors. > > Block level addressing in the Karlsruhe style where GeoBase provides > addressing data. I have just thought about the addressing. If we do not import all geobase id how can make the address model work ? > > > National hydro network. Include this in OSM. Michel > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
