2008/12/8 Richard Weait <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Does it make sense to split up the GeoBase Import pages by database? > Perhaps somebody with some wiki-fu could look at this for us? As we > fill things in on the current page it will soon be too long a page to be > easily managed. > > I'm imagining: > > GeoBase Import > - with an introductory paragraph, brief history, and a status table and > links for the sub-projects. Move the announcement down the page, or > link to it on a separate page? > > Then separate pages for each sub-project, for example: > GeoBase Satellite imagery > - description of the data, source and how OSM came to have it. > - existing resources: is it in a public WMS? > - Plans: can a WMS plugin for josm / potlatch / merkaartor take > advantage of the existing WMS? > - Who's planning to do what to integrate the resource for OSM use? > Perhaps as a table with the specific tasks, task owners, milestones and > progress indicators that can migrate back to the summary page? > > Then similar pages as appropriate for the other sub-projects. > > Does this seem about right?
I like the idea. It will be easier to follow the progress by sub-project. Michel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
