2009/1/1 Sam Vekemans <[email protected]> > Hi there,Reading the discussion about boarders reminds be of the > interesting situation off the coast of Nova Scotia to Newfoundland, where > there is an island which is Actually part of France. > ... there is also an extra part of Quebec, north of Prince Edward Island > (Magdelene islands). > So tagging gets interesting. > > > Anyway, Im not sure if Michel was able to remove the 1st round of GeoBase > import, the GeoPolitical Boarders, so to set it right. The problem was > about the number of nodes in a way, and a solution was given (but it's WAY > beyond my ability to understand :) ... i thought that you might be able to > be of some help here. > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-ca/2008-December/000483.html > > Thanks, > Sam Vekemans > Across Canada Trails >
I am done yet with the deletions. I encountered problems with JOSM. The ways were deleted but not the nodes partially. Therefore, there are thousand and thousand orphans nodes that have to be deleted by hand. > > > > P.S. on another note, > > It looks like user pythagore had already did some importing of GeoBase > roads (that was back in October). ... was that the sample area? .. probably > was :) > > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=47.2218&lon=-61.9588&zoom=13&layers=0B00FTTTT > > created_by = JOSMnat_ref = cf448c8d7b7c45acb4f82cbfb015ac72highway = > residentiallanes = 2source = geobase > > Richard Weait's option was > geobase:nat_ref = "nat_ref#" > > Or perhaps there's a better option? > Of course, it was a proof of concept ;-). I have done : Rimouski, Gaspesia, Kamploops and Magdelene Islands. For my next boundaries upload, I plan using the uuid tag to keep the Geobase ID as first proposed by Richard. I think I prefer geobase:nat_ref. We need to fix this before the next upload. Michel
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
