Hi Sam,

 

I am not done yet with the chart.

 

I've checked with my co-workers about the "In geobase" statement of canvec 
features. It means that the same feature exist in a geobase product (in this 
case the NHN). I think we should first use the features in canvec. Later we 
could check what we can get from the NHN that was not in canvec. The NHN add a 
lot of feature types that will be of no use in OSM.

 

So this is why I have decided to add the mapping for these features.

 

The "N/A in OSM" mean that I was unable to find something appropriate in OSM 
map features wiki page : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features

 

Regards,

 

 Jean-Sebastien Moreau


Ressources naturelles Canada / Natural Resources Canada 
Centre d'information topographique / Centre for Topographic Information 
Gouvernement du Canada / Government of Canada 
2144-010 rue King Ouest, Sherbrooke  (Québec)  Canada  J1J 2E8 
2144-010 King West Street, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada  J1J 2E8 
téléphone / phone: 819.564.5600 ext. 252
télécopieur / facsimile: 819.564.5698 

email: [email protected]

 

 

________________________________

From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sam 
Vekemans
Sent: March 3, 2009 6:04 PM
To: Moreau, Jean-Sébastien; Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Wiki edits - Hydrography

 

Hi thanks for all the edits :) 

 

1 - I like the new table edit, where 3 lines are merges into 1 ... that makes 
sence ... and saves in space making the chart smaller. ... 

When i go through the other charts again, i'll be fixing that.

 

2 - I saw you indicated that more of the Features are listed in NHN than i have 
indicated.

 

The source for my assumption that items were in geobase is from the CanVec PDF 
map features cart, where it lists weather or not the item is in fact IN geobase.

 

So my assumption is that the charts already were correct???

 

So to elevate this quarry, i propose that a link to the GeoBase NHN chart is 
made available (link to it), and in the NHN chart, these same map features get 
listed.

 

Anyway, when looking over the latest verion of canvec2osm, i see that those 
items that were put in the 'geobase' folder,.. are actually very good.  IMO.

 

I havent yet (but i should) dig into geobase and download for myself the NHN 
area of Niagra falls.. I can then make the same import script using the 
shp-to-osm Java script, and add in all of the database columns, with the 
appropriate source tags.

 

I would recommend my method, rather than using the geobase2osm script.   This 
is because for Hydrography, there is very little to no actual 'duplicates'.   
So searching the area to find any duplicates is very easy going about it the 
manual way.

 

Also, i do have a bias about geobase2osm (that is that i do not understand HOW 
to actually run the script)  For me, running a java script is simple, because 
Java is already installed on windows machines when your on the net.  .. perl & 
python is VERY confusing :-)

 

However, like NHN, the canvec2osm features DO cover a WHOLE LOT of data.. so 
taking on the next phase is some extra work. ... which i think also needs to be 
done.

 

That said, i would propose that once im mostly done the charts and matching up 
all the features which is NOT in GeoBase, that i hold off on pushing for 
import.  Then I can start work on the GeoBaseNHN2osm.bat script

 

Has anyone already started it?

 

Oh ya, and 1 last point.

 

For where it says "Is in GeoBase - do not use - N/A in OSM" I would like to 
challenge each of these statements and explain WHY.... ie. 

39- Manmade hydrographic entity - (Entité hydrographique anthropique)

1450009

Image:Mf_node.png <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:Mf_node.png> way 
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:Mf_way.png>  area 
<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Image:Mf_area.png> 

Wharf - ( Quai )

A structure built along or at an angle to the shore of navigable waters so that 
ships may lie alongside to receive and discharge cargo and passengers.

1450080;1450081;1450082

Is in GeoBase - do not use - N/A in OSM

 

A "warf" is certainly applicable in OSM, at some point boaters will be able to 
use OSM, as they can help fix the charts and map the oceans. ... :-)  (once 
boaters see the awesome power of community mapping, that is.)

  

 

Cheers,

Sam Vekemans

Across Canada Trails

_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Reply via email to