2009/3/25 James Ewen <[email protected]> > On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 3:06 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Do 'we' have a statergy to fix all the unconnected roads? (other than > > manually, which would be a huge problem in large cities). > > Not that I know of, which is why I am in the process of wiping out the > data that I manually entered into Sherwood Park, and then redoing the > import from Geobase. It is easier to fix the Geobase ways than it is > to try and create GeoBase compatible information from OSM data.
We should put an hold on the import untill we get a concensus on the approach and take the time to correct the Alberta. I do beleive that the GeoBase must connect to existing OSM. As Simon mentionned, the correction may become a huge task if our application does not make the work automatically. I know Jean-Sébastien work made sure that the import preserve the integration between existing OSM and GeoBase. Sam argument not to touch existing osm does not make sense. The main goal of collaborative work is to improve the final product. Michel > > > James > VE6SRV > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > -- Michel Gilbert
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
