On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Paul Johnson<[email protected]> wrote: > I'm curious if bicycle boulevards would qualify as living streets, given > that a living street would most closely describe a bicycle boulevard in > OSM terms, though a bicycle boulevard might lack pedestrian facilities. > Frequently, these are not streets you would want to let the kids play > in, as the volume of fast-moving, near-silent vehicles would present a > very real collision hazard at peak traffic times. This kind of way has > sprung up only in the last 10 years or so, and almost all of them were > formerly highway=residential prior to becoming bicycle boulevards.
No, I wouldn't tag them as living streets. Bike boulevards don't have a speed limit of 7km/hr and don't usually have the same surface treatment to merge sidewalks into the roadway. However, a cycleway=boulevard might be a good tag to have. Corey _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
