On 2010-02-11, at 11:18 AM, Richard Weait wrote: > On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Robert Shand <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2010-02-11, at 10:26 AM, Sam Vekemans wrote: >>> I also like Franks idea of hosting tiles rendered, so an example can be >>> shown. >>> (and Daniel just mentioned that the address range data will be available) >> >> Richard is removing the data as I speak. I won't have time to look at things >> more until the weekend. However I do like the idea of doing a different set >> of rendered tiles to highlight what their data can add to OSM. > > The small sample of data that I saw was pretty low-quality. Address > nodes were in the water and in intersections. Yuck. If you want an > example of address data that might be nice to add to OSM, have a look > at the Toronto data example on my site. Once properly rectified > (thank you, Emilie) the addresses line up very nicely with OSM road > vectors. Sadly, their data license does not permit use in OSM; my > sample image did not import the data to OSM.
The data I was looking at was perfect for Charlottetown and that comes from the same source. Perhaps there is something else going on too B _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
