Awesome! Do you have the .osm files that you converted & uploaded? Would you be able to make them available (provide a link to it) Were you able to get all of the building areas in those 2 tiles?
Thanks, Sam P.S. I updated the Google Docs chart indicating your progress. On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Daniel Bégin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > > > Just let you know that I’ve completed Canvec Road and Building import in > Montréal area (south shore, Montréal, Laval and north shore). It has been a > very tedious work to integrate Canvec to existing Osm data. > > > > Here are few comments (you probably know many of them but just in case…) > > > > I used Canvec_to_osm to convert data and JOSM for uploading > > - Canvec_to_osm creates duplicate nodes at road intersections. I > was not able to automatically fix them using the latest JOSM (2561) and > Validator plugging (18848) - If someone has an earlier version that works > properly for duplicated nodes, there are still a lot of them to remove. > > - Canvec_to_osm associates tags to inner polygons, instead of > outer polygon, for relations. All have been corrected (buildings) > > - JOSM had sometime problems when uploading, creating duplicates > nodes/ways. All have been corrected > > > > > > Most frequent problems encounter with existing data > > - Hundreds of street name abbreviations. All have been corrected > (running on windows OS I must thanks notepad++ ) > > - Dual carriage ways mapped as single line. All have been > corrected - at least those present in Canvec dataset – keeping the original > one and adding a parallel way with same attributes! > > - Usually no ramp/slipway mapped on streets. Almost all of them > added > > - Usually no bridge tag used for viaduct. Almost all of them > added > > - Features captured using Yahoo! Imagery doesn’t always fit > corresponding GPS tracks (Compared to Canvec that usually does). Worst cases > have been corrected through nodes displacement. > > - Highway categories (primary, secondary, and tertiary, > residential …) were a bit messy. I’ve proposed a discussion on Montreal > wiki page about that topic but no answer yet. > > > > Don’t you think we are creating fantastic maps! > > > > Daniel > > > ------------------------------ > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto: > [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Adam Dunn > *Sent:* February 12, 2010 19:57 > *To:* talk-ca > *Subject:* [Talk-ca] 092G03 NRN Import Complete > > > > Well, I've just finished up the airport area, which makes 092G03 finished. > This also means that the entirety of Vancouver, the GVRD, and surrounding > suburbs are all done the import (092G01, 092G02, 092G03, 092G06, 092G07). I > covered the western half and Michael Barabanov covered the eastern half. > > You can get the NRN .osm files for 092G03 from > http://www.mediafire.com/?sharekey=f5178f4ac8a21af3d9d5c56d04dfa8b0ab39fc21f86bbc83a4648785df63f216(hopefully > that link works). > > Adam > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
