Hi, I know that was an old message, I've uploaded a sample from http://osm.progysm.com/rncan/geobase/nhn_rhn/01/nlflow/ NHN_01EA000_1_1_HN_NLFLOW_1.0.xml.gz<http://osm.progysm.com/rncan/geobase/nhn_rhn/01/nlflow/NHN_01EA000_1_1_HN_NLFLOW_1.0.xml.gz> NHN_01EA000_1_1_HN_NLFLOW_1.1.xml.gz<http://osm.progysm.com/rncan/geobase/nhn_rhn/01/nlflow/NHN_01EA000_1_1_HN_NLFLOW_1.1.xml.gz>
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.81935&lon=-66.13426&zoom=16&layers=B000FTF http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/59007447 You can see where the blue arrows are. I added the tag from waterway=stream and in some cases, added oneway=yes This is the 'linear network flow' so what it does is show the direction of the water flow & perhaps the current of the water. Showing an arrow on the water is great for marriners to use the map, so they would know the best routing on the water & canoeists to navigate the waters. It would also (maybe?) be the center line of the water area. Anyway, this data is not going to be available in canvec, & the WMS for it is available which shows these lines josm link http://wms.cits.rncan.gc.ca/cgi/wms_en.cgi?map=/export/wms/mapfiles/rhn/geobase_rhn.map&version=1.1.1&service=WMS&request=Getmap&layer=HYDRO_AGGREGAT&format=image/png&STYLE=default&layers=GEOBASE_RHN_NHN&; So my question is, should this be changed from sub_sea=steam to waterway=stream (and add oneway=yes) to those that dont have oneway attached already? (The name isn't needed, because it is usually on all the waterbody) http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/59005883 Thanks, Sam On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:48 AM, Yan Morin <[email protected]> wrote: > Sam Vekemans ask me to talk about this to be sure the file are ok: > http://osm.progysm.com/rncan/geobase/nhn_rhn/01/ > > Sam ask me for Geobase NL_FLOW in OSM files, so I began with 01. > > The rules were (based on http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/GeoBaseNHN2osm > ) > > line,NID,,attribution,Natural Resources Canada > outer,NID,,attribution,Natural Resources Canada > inner,NID,,attribution,Natural Resources Canada > line,NID,,source,GeobaseNHN_Import_2009 > outer,NID,,source,GeobaseNHN_Import_2009 > inner,NID,,source,GeobaseNHN_Import_2009 > line,NID,,created_by,geobaseNHN-to-osm > outer,NID,,created_by,geobaseNHN-to-osm > inner,NID,,created_by,geobaseNHN-to-osm > line,NID,,geobase:UUID,- > outer,NID,,geobase:UUID,- > inner,NID,,geobase:UUID,- > line,ACCURACY,,accuracy:meters,- > outer,ACCURACY,,accuracy:meters,- > inner,ACCURACY,,accuracy:meters,- > line,TYPE,1,waterway,stream > line,TYPE,1,waterway:type,observed > line,TYPE,2,sub_sea,stream > line,TYPE,2,sub_sea:type,inferred > line,TYPE,3,waterway,canal > line,TYPE,3,waterway:type,constructed > line,DIRECTION,1,oneway,yes > line,DIRECTION,2,oneway,-1 > line,NAME_1,,name:1,- > line,NAME_2,,name:2,- > > I've used name:1 instead of name to get the name in OSM, but not display > it because SLWATER and WATERBODY already have the name. name:1 and > name:2 can be compared with SLWATER name when you import the data. > > Should I continue or fix something before doing 02 to 11? > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
