So there should be no new mass import from canvect data which would overwrite it or put it back to its original state? That is the reason I was wondering if it should keep a reference to canvect data...
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 2:08 PM, G. Michael Carter <[email protected]>wrote: > My logic... if it's a new building, it's a new object so the tag > references can go. As for delete or modify... the end result, we want > accurate objects, so in my opinion do what ever is easier. > > > > On 18/08/10 01:57 PM, Louis-Marius Gendreau wrote: > > Hi a building > here<http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.5435791611671&lon=-73.563372194767&zoom=17>is > wrong. Much of it has been destroyed and it was split in two in the > process. As it was imported from Canvect, I am wondering how to best adress > this. Delete and recreate? Change into one smaller building and keep all > canvect reference tags on it and then create a new buildling for the other > part? Other? > > > > -- > Louis-Marius Gendreau > > > -- Louis-Marius Gendreau B: 514-285-4665 C: 514-244-3167 F: 514-285-1621
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
