On 26-8-2010 20:02, Bégin, Daniel wrote:
Well, what can I say?
the Canadian community agreed on using water_cover proposal almost a year ago
and the entire canadian contry is now available in .osm format using this
proposal...
What do you think?
I'm fine with either schema. We can always retag our NL stuff, so that's
not a factor.
As far as mapnik is concerned, it also makes no difference either way.
It currently treats all natural=wetland the same, so that's not ideal
either. Better support for these tags is needed for both tagging
schemes. It's just that I was under the impression that wetland=* had
won out over water_cover, not just on the wiki (but who reads that
thing? :)) and also in practice.
A note on the water_cover wiki page that the tagging has been adopted
for the CanVec conversion and will start to appear in OSM shortly might
be helpful. I don't remember, but has this been on the lists?
--
Lennard
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
