On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 4:52 PM, Gordon Dewis <[email protected]> wrote: > One thing I've been wondering about WRT data brought in from Canvec is what > to do about the Canvec-related attributes when correcting/extending ways > that came from Canvec. Specifically, I'm thinking of the "source" attribute. > I usually remove the source attribute if I've change the way, combined it > with other non-Canvec ways, extended it, or similar. I expect the convention > for this sort of thing is written down somewhere, but I haven't seen it. > Some guidance would be appreciated. > > Thanks! > > Gordon (KeeperOfMaps)
Hi Gordon, and welcome to you as well. I'm not sure that we have guidance on that written down anywhere. I leave the attribution if I'm making a minor change and replace it if I'm making a major revision. So old canvec buildings that have since been demolished, I change to landuse=brownfield and source=survey. Any other suggestions on this? Best regards, Richard _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
