Fair enough. Opps, sorry Twain. I should have waited the standard 48 hrs, for a responce back before asking others.
The fixme note could probably have been more general, as there is no direct solutiom, as you might have seen from the wiki pages about that. So i'll just leave it as it is, and if anyone wants to change it, go right ahead. The data was a one-way import, so any changes need to be done manually. cheers, sam On 12/12/10, Steve Singer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, 12 Dec 2010, Sam Vekemans wrote: > >> I'm just cc'ing talk-ca. >> >> >> and im not sure about the renderings/tagging of this. >> ... perhaps it's better if i remove everything that i added? > > I don't see why you should remove this data just because we don't have an > approved way to tag it. If anything the tagging should > be changed. 'boundary=aboriginal_lands' still seems to be a proposed > rather than accepted tagging. I suspect his complaint with admin_level not > being an integer, which I see as a fair tagging complaint but I would be > inclined to try get some sort of tagging consensus (at least for the > americas+austrilia) before changing the tag to another unapproved values. > > > Also, I'm not a big fan of 'cc:'ing someones private message through the OSM > mail system to a public mailing list. > > Steve > > > -- Twitter: @Acrosscanada Blogs: http://acrosscanadatrails.posterous.com/ http://Acrosscanadatrails.blogspot.com Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans Skype: samvekemans IRC: irc://irc.oftc.net #osm-ca Canadian OSM channel (an open chat room) @Acrosscanadatrails _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
