I have been wondering about them for a while, too. In fact, when tidying up links I often remove the annoying little 0-0 address ranges because they add nothing to the dataset.
--G -----Original Message----- From: Nathan Edgars II <nerou...@gmail.com> Sender: talk-ca-boun...@openstreetmap.org Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:09:35 To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools<tagg...@openstreetmap.org> Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap<talk-ca@openstreetmap.org> Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] [Tagging] 0-0 address lines On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Sam Vekemans <acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com> wrote: > ... and the reason for having a '0' was to show where (geometrically) > it will be. > So if people do know what the housenumber range actually is (or want > to extrapolate it from statsCan) they are welcome to. Two comments on this: Why would the ends of surveyed house numbers be the same as the ends of the imported ways? Why are these next to ways that don't have and never will have addresses, such as motorways and links? _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
