As an aside, the imports in the lower mainland were not done by Sam, but by mbiker. I'm not sure on the exact import process used for the NRN data. If I were to do the imports over again myself I think I'd use CanVec 7.0 which seems to have the same data but I haven't evaluated it in any detail.
-----Original Message----- From: Sam Vekemans [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 6:52 AM To: Kevin Michael Smith; Talk-CA OpenStreetMap Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Proposal: Cleanup of NHN ways in BC Cool, if i knew how to edit a stylesheet i would :) So t hat's fine. So perhaps then it can be all changed with a bot? ... or is it better to simply wipe my edits? The rivers (without oneway=yes tag) is available in another api, so it's no big deal. cheers, Sam On 2/22/11, Kevin Michael Smith <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 2011-02-22 at 06:34 -0800, Sam Vekemans wrote: >> Great! Were getting somewhere.. >> >> >> Now lets discuss the most appropriate tag that can be used to >> indicate the rendering of a flow line arrow. > > It's not about tagging the rivers to say 'there should be an arrow > here', it's about putting 'Rivers have arrows' in the style sheet for > the renderer. 'Having arrows' isn't a property of the river, it's a > property of how we may or may not want to display it. > > -- > Kevin Michael Smith <[email protected]> > -- Twitter: @Acrosscanada Blogs: http://acrosscanadatrails.posterous.com/ http://Acrosscanadatrails.blogspot.com Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans Skype: samvekemans IRC: irc://irc.oftc.net #osm-ca Canadian OSM channel (an open chat room) @Acrosscanadatrails _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
