Purposly delaying the inevetable... so i'll no longer be editing ... so all my edits should be considered 'spam' so then others can removed it.
.... or I can accept the agreement and go and start removing all of my edits since i started. .... all edits that i have touched at any stage of edits should be removed. Would this be easier? cheers, Sam On 3/26/11, Tom Hughes <[email protected]> wrote: > On 26/03/11 04:03, Samuel Dyck wrote: > >> Let me clarify, will the so called tainted data still be up for the near >> future, or will I be spending my week preforming hectic Canvec imports >> to save street names I gathered with a pen and paper? It doesn't look >> good for me >> <http://osm.informatik.uni-leipzig.de/map/?zoom=12&lat=49.88177&lon=-97.17517&layers=B0>. > > Please ignore Sam - there is no data removal planned for next week. > > I think he has confused the stages of the license change process - the > next stage is to ask people to accept or decline the license before they > can edit. > > It is not the point at which the license will change and problem data > may have to be removed. It is not even the point at which people who > decline will not be able to edit any more. > > More details about the implementation plan can be found here: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Implementation_Plan > > As I understand things it is Phase 3 which we are close to entering, not > Phase 5. > > Tom > > -- > Tom Hughes ([email protected]) > http://compton.nu/ > -- --- Across Canada Trails - Beyond 2017 - The National Trails Network Victoria, BC Canada Twitter: @Acrosscanada Blog: http://acrosscanadatrails.posterous.com/ Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/sam.vekemans Skype: 'Sam Vekemans' Member, CommonMap Inc. http://commonmap.org/ IRC: irc://irc.oftc.net #CommonMap Also find us on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
