My suggestion on the coastline. Connect both the canvec and existing together at some point. Leave it for a few days. Then delete the old one.
That way there's always a connected coastline. Especially if the coastline is one of the great lakes. It also handles the case I ran into. I finished a project and moved on, then someone wiped out part of my changes with an update (they grabbed data days before my updates) this created a disconnected coastline. Michael On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:29 PM, James A. Treacy <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > I have been adding canvec data for the last part of the Bruce > Peninsula and noticed that the existing shoreline is quite different > than that given by the canvec data. The source for the existing > coastline is r_coastlines and I have no idea who/what that is. > I don't know which is more accurate but the canvec coastline matches > much better with the land features. > > Should the existing coastline be left alone or should it be switched > over? > > -- > James (Jay) Treacy > [email protected] > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > -- * G. Michael Carter* Contact: H: 1-519-940-8935 | W: 1-905-267-8494 | M: 1-519-215-1869 | F: 1-519-941-0009 Google Talk: xmpp:[email protected] <http://livedvd.carterfamily.ca/><http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.9216&lon=-80.105&zoom=14&layers=B000FTF> <http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=43.9216&lon=-80.105&zoom=14&layers=B000FTF>
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
