On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:23:18PM -0400, Andrew MacKinnon wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 10:57 PM, James A. Treacy <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 07:07:37PM -0700, Adam Dunn wrote: > >> I've done a cursory examination of the Oshawa Harbour, and it would > >> appear that there are two ways defining the water's edge: > >> 1.) a PGS Coastline import, which is tagged as natural=coastline, > >> 2.) a Canvec import, which is tagged as natural=water, and is part of > >> a multipolygon relation, tagged with natural=water. > > I have been trying to clean up the coastline by getting rid of the > natural=water ways and cleaning up the natural=coastline ways (which > are terribly inaccurate). I only got as far as Port Hope I believe > before stopping.
Will you be continuing? I've been on a roll and would be willing to continue into Lake Ontario, but as you've started it is only fair to let you continue if you wish. If you wish to continue, I'll just work on another area. There is a tricky part between Lake Huron and Lake Erie that I've been avoiding. -- James (Jay) Treacy [email protected] _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
