The P(Y) code (the encrypted military code) is transmitted on the same 
frequency as the L1C civilian code and on a different frequency with the L2C 
civilian code. Regardless, tests by the major GPSr manufacturers indicate that 
civilian receivers will be significantly impacted by what is effectively 
front-end overload. I'm not sure there's any reason to expect that military 
receivers wouldn't suffer similarly if they're using the main L1 frequency.

It's still a mystery why the US government would even consider issuing a 
license for a system that will adversely impact millions of American users.

  --G

Sent from my iPad

On 2011-08-21, at 20:55, Corey Burger <[email protected]> wrote:

> Military GPS also use different frequencies.
> 
> Corey
> 
> On Aug 21, 2011 5:54 PM, "Gordon Dewis" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Well, yes, but much of the border is sparsely populated -- most of the 
> > population lives in large cities, many of which aren't located on the 
> > border. I imagine the range of the devices they're planning on installing 
> > is comparable to cell phones rather than hundreds of kilometres. 
> > 
> > --G
> > 
> > Sent from my iPad
> > 
> > On 2011-08-21, at 20:32, Richard Weait <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> >> On Sun, Aug 21, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Gordon Dewis <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> The geocaching community has been watching this for a while. I don't 
> >>> understand why this has gotten as far as it has given that the GPS system 
> >>> is owned by the United States and is used for military and law 
> >>> enforcement applications domestically. You would think that the 
> >>> government would just say no to this. This shouldn't have a huge impact 
> >>> in Canada, except perhaps near the border.
> >> 
> >> The majority of the population in Canada is "near the border" for some
> >> value of "near". ;-) Wikipedia says 80% within 150km of the border.
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Talk-ca mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Reply via email to