On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 4:34 PM, G. Michael Carter <[email protected]> wrote: > I wish they'd updated the Bing high resolution images.... In Orangeville > there's a new mall, but only one image (of three tiles) has the new mall, > the other has the cleared field from when they started. I can only put in > half the buildings. > Any ideas on how often they update the high res?
SteveC asked for suggestions for bing imagery updates, without being able to promise anything, in June. http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2011-June/058862.html I guess that half of Orangeville made it onto the list. :-) It is important to remember that every source we use for OSM lies to us in one way or another. We've each been misled at one point or another by our own GPX tracks, old / mis-aligned / unresolvable aerial imagery, our imperfect memories and illegible hand writing, outdated, mis-aligned or just dead wrong vectors from other sources. So we don't always get things right the first time, or when we think we are improving the work of another mapper. That's okay. We can fix it. That's part of what we're all about. _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
