Maybe it wasn't thought through and maybe it has implications, but that wasn't the point.
Steve stevecoast.com On Sep 7, 2011, at 17:56, john whelan <[email protected]> wrote: > No, it was put in because we didn't want to have a rerun of all this mess if > something better came along next time. > > Steve > > > Unfortunately it had implications that don't seem to have been thought > through especially for imports which I think are important for Canada where > we seem to have lots of places to map and a lower density of mappers on the > ground than some areas. > > Cheerio John
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
