I prefer the Swartz Bay scheme because it is more reflective of the reality on the ground. I was just looking at these terminals last night!
Speaking of ferry terminals, I've been adding more detail to the Tsawwassen ferry terminal. http://goo.gl/2vzKx There is a situation where there is an overhead walkway, which I've mapped as a building with layer = 1, with some roads underneath, then on top of the walkway is an elevated road (layer 2) leading to the upper vehicle loading ramp. How shall I fix it so the building is above the road? I've had other situations where roads pass under or through buildings and it never renders the way I like, such as hotel entrances and vehicle inspection buildings. -- Matthew Buchanan -- Kamloops, BC On 18 October 2011 00:14, Paul Norman <[email protected]> wrote: > There are two different and conflicting ways of tagging motorways at ferry > terminals. The first of these, as shown at the Horseshoe Bay terminal > http://osm.org/go/WJQnahqdV- is of having one way where there are many lanes > and tagging as highway=motorway. The second, shown at Swartz Bay > http://osm.org/go/WJEP9q90r- is drawing the lanes as highway=service and > terminating the motorway when it stops being one. > > > > The same issue applies at border crossings, except for the ones I’ve looked > at the choice is between highway=motorway and highway=primary. > > > > I have reservations about tagging highway=motorway on a section of road that > has speed bumps, stop signs and traffic lights. > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
