Yes because it is the individual contributor who has to accept the OSM's new licensing terms, the data was not imported directly from CANVEC into OSM.
As a Canadian tax payer I'm not quite certain I like the idea of OSM having the power to re-license Government data but that is a separate issue. Cheerio John On 19 December 2011 13:33, Gordon Dewis <[email protected]> wrote: > If the source of data in jeopardy is CanVec do we need to remove it given > that there are no issues with CanVec data being in OSM? > > > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Andrew Allison <[email protected] > > wrote: > >> Hello: >> Unless I'm missing something or it's a bug Using the OSM Inspector >> tool. The coastline data as going to be removed, or at least a >> significant amount. >> >> >> http://tools.geofabrik.de/osmi/?view=wtfe&lon=-81.24969&lat=42.97091&zoom=13&overlays=overview,wtfe_point_harmless,wtfe_line_harmless,wtfe_point_modified,wtfe_line_modified_cp,wtfe_line_modified,wtfe_point_created,wtfe_line_created_cp,wtfe_line_created >> >> There is a lot of data being flagged by users who haven't been >> around >> in years. Sigh >> >> Andrew >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Talk-ca mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
