On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:37 AM, James Ewen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Richard Weait <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 1) I look at the license status of the area in the course of my normal >> mapping. While mapping, I make sure to clean problematic objects >> rather than just editing them. Every mapper should be aware of the >> license status of objects while mapping. If you ignore this, you >> might be making improvements that will be discarded in the license >> change. > > Is there a link showing how to accomplish this? I understand the > difference between compliant and non-compliance, but how do you > "modify" the existing node/way enough to make it compliant? Do I need > to delete the non-compliant and completely replace it?
Some great tools are listed here. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Remapping Some principles are listed here. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/What_is_clean%3F In short. If it was created by a non-agreeing account; remove it and remap from a compatible source. If it was modified by a non-agreeing account; remove the aspect they modified. There are edge-cases of course. This is OSM. :-) Let's discuss this in more detail but break it off to another thread? _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
