Bonjour again! Available administrative boundary will be included in the next release of Canvec.osm. From the wiki, here is the tagging values I'm going to use...
Municipal Regional: boundary=administrative; admin_level=5 Upper municipality: boundary=administrative; admin_level=6 Municipality: boundary=administrative; admin_level=8 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Admin_level (Canada) Municipality admin_level=8 corresponds to gdf order in ISO standard. Municipal Regional Area and Upper Municipality (admin_level=5 and 6) are different from what the ISO standard says (gdf order=6 and 7). Is someone can confirm that admin_level=5 and 6 is really what is expected? Thanks again Daniel Bégin Centre d'information topographique de Sherbrooke Topographic Information Center of Sherbrooke Ressources Naturelles Canada / Natural Ressources Canada 2144, rue King Ouest, bureau 010 Sherbrooke (Québec) J1J 2E8 (819) 564-5600 ext.242, [email protected]
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
