Frederik, can we get these reverted? I'd do it myself but I'm not confident enough with the revert tools and I doubt this changeset will revert cleanly.
In the particular example of way 44925685, a quick look shows no tags that could not be recovered with TIGER and odbl=clean. As an aside, wasn't the view expressed on the rebuild conference call to go with a v0 concept for ways, in which case parts of the tagging would remain on the 1st? > -----Original Message----- > From: Nathan Edgars II [mailto:nerou...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 1:59 AM > To: OpenStreetMap talk-us list > Subject: [Talk-us] The vandalism has begun > > Even before April Fools: > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/10842511 > > I love how portions of US 2, US 83, and US 95 are now in Canada. > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.562&lon=-112.387&zoom=11&layers=M > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=48.812&lon=-101.089&zoom=11&layers=M > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=46.5966&lon=-116.9202&zoom=12&layers=M > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-us mailing list > talk...@openstreetmap.org > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
