Indeed, I have been using JOSM for every part of assembling and maintaining
this data set.
- David E. Nelson
________________________________
From: Pierre Béland <[email protected]>
To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2012 4:55:35 PM
Subject: [Talk-ca] Re : Re : British Columbia Regional District boundary data
David,
If you import the file into JOSM, you should see these steps and repair easily.
Other then that, everything is fine. As you can see, Nominatim searches are now
more efficient around Victoria.
Pierre
>________________________________
> De : David E. Nelson <[email protected]>
>À : "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>Envoyé le : Mercredi 6 juin 2012 17h58
>Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] Re : British Columbia Regional District boundary data
>
>
>BTW, as the import progresses north along the BC Coast, that "stairstep"
>pattern is going to reappear on the sea boundary of other Regional Districts.
>This pattern, again, was found in the original boundary data as obtained from
>DataBC.
>
>
>- David E. Nelson
>
>
>
>________________________________
> From: Corey Burger <[email protected]>
>To: David E. Nelson <[email protected]>
>Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2012 2:44:19 PM
>Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Re : British Columbia Regional District boundary data
>
>Looks good according to me.
>
>Corey
>
>On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 2:41 PM, David E. Nelson <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Yes, I set up the second user account "British Columbia Regional Districts",
>> as recommended by the import guidelines on the OSM Wiki.
>>
>> I accidentally duplicated a way on the Canada-U.S. Border. I believe that I
>> have now fixed that, and the borders now share a way, as they properly
>> should. Can you confirm?
>>
>> - David E. Nelson
>>
________________________________
>> From: Corey Burger <[email protected]>
>> To: Pierre Béland <[email protected]>
>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2012 1:50:18 PM
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Re : British Columbia Regional District boundary data
>>
>> Pierre,
>>
>> David N is the real person behind that user.
>>
>> Corey
>>
>> On
Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:34 PM, Pierre Béland <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>> Looking at this into JOSM, I see that this step way is a new way166383324
>>> distinct from the Canada-US border. It was created by British Columbia
>>> Regional Districts user. This was probably as is in the original data and
>>> not detected.
>>>
>>> Pierre
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>> De : Corey Burger <[email protected]>
>>> À : Andrew Lester <[email protected]>
>>> Cc : [email protected]
>>> Envoyé le : Mercredi 6 juin 2012 16h15
>>> Objet : Re:
[Talk-ca] Re : British Columbia Regional District boundary
>>> data
>>>
>>> I just looked at the layer in the CRD's database and we have it
>>> following the US Border, than that stepped pattern. No idea where that
>>> mistake came from.
>>>
>>> Corey
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Andrew Lester <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> Note that this CRD map
>>>> (http://crdatlas.ca/media/8187/crd_adminbounds2009.pdf) shows the
>>>> boundary
>>>> following the US border.
>>>> Otherwise, it looks good. I live in the CRD, so I figured I'd better
>>>> check
>>>> it out!
>>>> Andrew
Lester
>>>>
>>>> -----Original
Message-----
>>>> From: David E. Nelson [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 1:05 PM
>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Re : British Columbia Regional District boundary
>>>> data
>>>>
>>>> That stairstep pattern was found in the original DataBC Tantalis RD
>>>> boundary
>>>> data, which should mean that that is the area geographically gazetted to
>>>> the
>>>> CRD by the Province.
>>>>
>>>> - David E. Nelson
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Corey Burger <[email protected]>
>>>> To: Pierre Béland <[email protected]>
>>>> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>
>>>> Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2012 1:02:47 PM
>>>> Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] Re : British Columbia Regional District boundary
>>>> data
>>>>
>>>> Pierre,
>>>>
>>>> I see the steps too. I suspect that might be a drawing error, but I
need
>>>> to
>>>> look more closely.
>>>>
>>>> (for the record, I am an employee of the CRD in Regional
Planning)
>>>>
>>>> Corey
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Pierre Béland <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>> David,
>>>>>
>>>>> I forgot to discuss about the boundary itself. Why the southern part
>>>>> look like steps and do not follow the red line division?
>>>>>
>>>>> Pierre
>>>>>
>>>>> ________________________________
>>>>> De : David E. Nelson <[email protected]> À :
>>>>> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Cc :
>>>>> "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Envoyé le :
>>>>> Mercredi 6 juin 2012 15h10 Objet : Re: [Talk-ca] British Columbia
>>>>> Regional District boundary data
>>>>>
>>>>> The first Regional District, Capital, has been uploaded to the
>>>>> database. I would like to know if it has been integrated into
>>>>> OpenStreetMap properly, and whether I
can continue with the remaining
>>>>> 27.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> - David E. Nelson
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>>> Talk-ca mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-ca mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
_______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-ca mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Talk-ca mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-ca
mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Talk-ca mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-ca mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>
>>
>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Talk-ca mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
