You're right : i will do so. Bruno Remy Le 2012-06-14 15:49, "Pierre Béland" <[email protected]> a écrit :
> I suggest to keep node 30915641 where content is more accurate. Tag > state_capital is ok. But the tag admin_level=4 should be removed. And I > dont know if capital=yes adds anything. > > We should avoid to create duplicates of the tag admin_level and not > confuse about where to place admin_level tags. > > Admin_level=4 refers to the province. It is placed in the boundary > relation for Quebec province (as it is presenly). > > > Admin_level=8 refers to the municipality. It is presently in the node for > Quebec city. wich is ok. But when a boundary relation will be created for > Quebec city, this admin_level tag will be moved to that boundary relation. > > Boundary relation :the node for Quebec city, 30915641, should be added to > boundary relation for Quebec province with role .admin_centre > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/61549. > > > > Pierre > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/30915641 > <http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/30915641> > addr:country = CA admin_level = 4 capital = yes > is_in<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is%20in?uselang=fr>= Québec, > Canada is_in:continent > = Amérique du Nord is_in:country = Canada is_in:state = Québec > is_in:state_code > = QC name <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:name?uselang=fr> = > Québec name:ar = كويبك سيتي name:en = Quebec name:eu = Québec name:fr > = Québec name:ru = Квебек > place<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:place?uselang=fr>= > city <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:place=city?uselang=fr> > population <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:population?uselang=fr>= > 8047000 state_capital > = yes superficy = 1667441 > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1781476959<http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/30915641> > admin_level = 8 capital = 8 > is_in<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is%20in?uselang=fr>= Canada, > Québec, Capitale-Nationale > name <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:name?uselang=fr> = Québec > name:en > = Quebec place<http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Key:place?uselang=fr>= > town <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/FR:Tag:place=town?uselang=fr> > population <http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:population?uselang=fr>= > 8047000 > > > ------------------------------ > *De :* Andrew Lester <[email protected]> > *À :* 'Pierre Béland' <[email protected]>; 'Bruno Remy' < > [email protected]>; [email protected] > *Envoyé le :* Jeudi 14 juin 2012 14h59 > *Objet :* RE: [Talk-ca] admin_level of canadian cities > > Ahh, you’re absolutely correct. I hadn’t noticed that node. The one I was > looking at is http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/30915641, which > isn’t part of any relations. One of these two “Quebec” nodes should > probably be removed and the remaining one added to the provincial relation. > > Andrew > > *From:* Pierre Béland [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Thursday, June 14, 2012 11:52 AM > *To:* Andrew Lester; 'Bruno Remy'; [email protected] > *Subject:* Re : [Talk-ca] admin_level of canadian cities > > We should not confuse province and municipality levels. > > Quebec city has admin_level=8. See node description > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/1781476959 > > Quebec province has admin_level=4. See Administrative boundary > relationhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/61549 > > *Pierre * > ------------------------------ > *De :* Andrew Lester <[email protected]> > *À :* 'Bruno Remy' <[email protected]>; [email protected] > *Envoyé le :* Jeudi 14 juin 2012 14h13 > *Objet :* Re: [Talk-ca] admin_level of canadian cities > > > As far as I can tell, the reason Quebec City is tagged as admin_level=4 is > because it’s the capital of the province. As per your linked wiki page, > provinces are admin_level=4. For any old non-capital city, they should be > tagged admin_level=8. Keep in mind that admin_level=* is primarily intended > for use on boundary ways and relations, not the place=* node. The usage of > admin_level=*and capital=* on city nodes is part of a proposed feature > covering capitals ( > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/capital). Contrary > to what that proposal outlines, the common usage according to Taginfo ( > http://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/capital#values) seems to be that > capitals are tagged as capital=[admin level number] (ie. Quebec City would > be tagged capital=4). > > Andrew Lester > Victoria, BC > > *From:* Bruno Remy [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Thursday, June 14, 2012 10:44 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [Talk-ca] admin_level of canadian cities > > hi, > > What do you suggest for "admin_level" of canadian cities, because i > noticed difference between the official Canadian recommendation on > Openstreetmap wiki ( > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Admin_level#10_admin_level_values_for_specific_countries) > witch is suggesting LEVEL 8 ... whereas you can check LEVEL 4 for big > cities in Canada on Opensstreetmap (Quebec City as instance...) > > So ... do we adjust our admin_level according to the canadian section of > openstreetmap's wiki? > Or do you suggest to keep on tracks on LEVEL 8 usage... and why? > > -- > Bruno Remy > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
