On Sun, 29 Jul 2012, Paul Norman wrote:
This is based on http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-us/2012-July/008830.html, a recent talk-us@ discussion about TIGER tags. Parts of this message are a copy/paste from there.
I think the following can be safely dropped: geobase:datasetName geobase:uuid
I agree. When I started the geobase road imports it predated the ability to add changeset tags or comments. A lot of my reasoning for having those tags was to be able to traceback objects to their original Geobase objects so we could come up with a way of updating OSM with future versions of the Geobase data. These tags have never (to my knowledge) been used for this and I doubt they would be very useful for this purpose if anyone tried to do so.
accuracy:meters waterway:type sub_sea:type Any thoughts? _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
