Sometimes retaining the address-numbering ways improves clarity, even when every node has an address.
For example, Wildwood Park in Winnipeg has a numbering logic that is almost impossible to discern on the ground, even for long-time residents of the neighbourhood. Seeing the ways rendered on the map makes it evident. http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=18/49.84682/-97.13276 Michael Z. -- Michael Zajac http://zajac.ca/ +1-204-943-6596 > Interpolations are generally regarded as approximations until we can get > individual addresses mapped. The post in case was about if was more common to > map a building with an address as one way with a building tag and address > tags or as one way with a building tag and a node with address tags. It is > more common to use a way with both a building tag and address tags by at > least 10:3. > > > > From: Bruno Remy [mailto: > bremy.qc.ca at gmail.com > ] > Sent: Thursday, October 24, 2013 7:34 PM > To: > talk-ca at openstreetmap.org > > Subject: [Talk-ca] Do we tag addresses on buildings or on separate nodes? > > > > Hi, > > What do you think of this blog? Adress nodes versus interpolations? > That's quite confusing :-/ > > What is the OpenStreetMap convention? Do we tag addresses on buildings or on > separate nodes? > http://t.co/tjRiwYSXLF > > > Bruno _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
