If you click on "View Details" you will get to this way: http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/28295454
I believe the problem is that the way is tagged as area=yes, despite not being closed. And I guess in general it would make more sense to have the city boundaries in a relation, not a way. I'm not totally sure about this, though, so maybe someone more familiar with the boundaries can have a look at it. Harald. On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Mark Bennett <[email protected]>wrote: > If I search for "Edmonton" on http://openstreetmap.org than select "City > Edmonton, Alberta, Canada" I am taken to this feature which is way out in > the country. > > http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/28295454 > > Shouldn't this take me to a marker in the centre of the city? Or at least > somewhere within the city boundry? I'm happy to fix this, but am not sure I > understand what's wrong. > > Any advice? Thanks! > > -mark > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > -- Please use encrypted communication whenever possible! Key-ID: 0x34cb93972f186565
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
