We could put it here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ottawa_Gatineau_Buildings
and then link to it from: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Canada:Ontario:Ottawa and http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gatineau under the data import section. That way people can find the information much easier On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 12:42 PM, Ellefsen, Bjenk (STATCAN) < bjenk.ellef...@canada.ca> wrote: > Great! Should we start a separate wiki page or put it under OSM Canada? > > > > *From:* James [mailto:james2...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* August-03-16 12:28 PM > *To:* Ellefsen, Bjenk (STATCAN) <bjenk.ellef...@canada.ca> > *Cc:* Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <talk-ca@openstreetmap.org> > *Subject:* [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada > > > > We can. People at State of the map US in seattle really seemed to enjoy > how well documented it was. Which makes maintenance a bit easier if stuff > is documented > > > > On Aug 3, 2016 12:23 PM, "Ellefsen, Bjenk (STATCAN)" < > bjenk.ellef...@canada.ca> wrote: > > The city of los angeles went through the same process(importing buildings) > and this might be useful for the project: > > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Los_angeles,_California/Buildings_Import > > > > On Aug 3, 2016 11:04 AM, "john whelan" <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Technically we can add to what is there but that adds volume to the > database. > > We also need to settle on the tags to be used. I noted the use of > building=retail I assume that is acceptable as well as commercial. > > Another tag used is ele which has the same values as building:levels but I > hadn't seen it before. > > Cheerio John > > > > On 3 Aug 2016 10:40 am, "Ellefsen, Bjenk (STATCAN)" < > bjenk.ellef...@canada.ca> wrote: > > We could use only a selection of tags. In the form in the interface we > will use, it could be just residential and apartments not be in the choices. > > > > We will use the tags reserved for buildings. As John mentioned, malls can > have just a few tags and then there are these shops and amenities floating > at the same address. Could we have the building and the tags shops, > offices, amenities attached to them? > > > > Bjenk > > > > *From:* James [mailto:james2...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* August-02-16 3:10 PM > *To:* john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> > *Cc:* Talk-CA OpenStreetMap <talk-ca@openstreetmap.org>; Ellefsen, Bjenk > (STATCAN) <bjenk.ellef...@canada.ca> > *Subject:* Re: [Talk-ca] Crowdsourcing buildings with Statistics Canada > > > > building=apartments should also be considered residential if not they are > tagged as offices. There is going to have to be grouping of some tags for > residential, commercial and industrial buildings to get a full tally > > Yeah, terrace homes, duplexes, triplexes, condos may all have unique civic > addresses. Apartments may have the the same civic address but also includes > an apartment no which needs to be mapped differently then just assigning a > address to a building(you are now getting into entraces and addr:flats) > example of a terrace home: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/2688375179 > and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/262705861 this is the way they are > doing it in the UK (after many hours in IRC asking how to properly map them) > > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:03 PM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > > How many buildings are tagged with a building tag or is that step one tag > building with the building tag and type? > > How do we handle a shopping mall with a building outline and a nodes for > the stores? > > Thanks John > > > > On 2 Aug 2016 2:53 pm, "James" <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There is a way to tag a building type > Here is a list of the building types: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building#Values > > > > On Aug 2, 2016 2:48 PM, "Ellefsen, Bjenk (STATCAN)" < > bjenk.ellef...@canada.ca> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > Here is what we would invite Canadians to tell us about buildings for OSM: > > > > name > > Address: > > · Number > > · street > > · city > > · postal code > > levels > > office, shop > > type of access (handicap, etc.) > > > > If there is a way to categorize them as residential, non-residential that > would be perfect. > > > > What do you think? Anything else we should add? > > > > > > Bjenk Ellefsen, PhD > > > > Data Exploration and Integration Lab (DEIL) | Lab pour l’exploration et > l’intégration de données (LEID) > > Center for Special Business Projects | Centre des Projets Spéciaux sur les > entreprises > > Statistics Canada | Statistique Canada > > (343) 998-3004 > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > > > > -- > > 外に遊びに行こう！ > > > > On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:03 PM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com> wrote: > > How many buildings are tagged with a building tag or is that step one tag > building with the building tag and type? > > How do we handle a shopping mall with a building outline and a nodes for > the stores? > > Thanks John > > > > On 2 Aug 2016 2:53 pm, "James" <james2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > There is a way to tag a building type > Here is a list of the building types: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:building#Values > > > > On Aug 2, 2016 2:48 PM, "Ellefsen, Bjenk (STATCAN)" < > bjenk.ellef...@canada.ca> wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > Here is what we would invite Canadians to tell us about buildings for OSM: > > > > name > > Address: > > · Number > > · street > > · city > > · postal code > > levels > > office, shop > > type of access (handicap, etc.) > > > > If there is a way to categorize them as residential, non-residential that > would be perfect. > > > > What do you think? Anything else we should add? > > > > > > Bjenk Ellefsen, PhD > > > > Data Exploration and Integration Lab (DEIL) | Lab pour l’exploration et > l’intégration de données (LEID) > > Center for Special Business Projects | Centre des Projets Spéciaux sur les > entreprises > > Statistics Canada | Statistique Canada > > (343) 998-3004 > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > > > > > -- > > 外に遊びに行こう！ > > -- 外に遊びに行こう！
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
