I agree with you that Michael is forcing us to improve the quality of our data. However, the way he is doing this also matters. Until we are convinced that he will not delete what has been done over the years, this thread should keep running. Then we will able to discuss about improving the Canvec import process.
About preferring quality over quantity, I think that in the context of this discussion, we are rather talking about having something on the map instead of nothing. Best regards, Daniel -----Original Message----- From: dega [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Thursday, 1 September, 2016 10:19 To: [email protected] Subject: [Talk-ca] broken forests in eastern Canada On September 1st, John Whelan wrote: > I suggest we formally request that he is prevented from making any > changes within Canada and his reversals be reverted. > The Canvec data was imported with the knowledge and support of the > local mappers and I think that's all that matters. I disagree! Michael's goal is to force us to improve the quality of our data. He's not a vandal. Personnaly, I also prefer quality over quantity. Why don't we take a pause to discuss how we can improve the quality of the CanVec import process? dega (a local mapper since 2007) _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca _______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
