I checked on OSM-legal. Would probably work if we had a statement from Peel agreeing to inclusion. As is, it's likely not compatible.
Stewart ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: "Simon Poole" <[email protected]> Date: Sep 8, 2016 13:57 Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licence compatibility: Open Data Licence for The Regional Municipality of Peel (Version 1.0) To: <[email protected]> Cc: > > The additional terms are "a bit of" a problem, however might be surmountable if they are willing to give us a statement specifically for the inclusion in OSM (along the lines of that they agree that the inclusion of the data in OpenStreetMap and distribution on terms of an open and free licence fulfils the conditions). > > All variants of the OGL have a further issue in that you actually have to verify that the Licensor has the necessary rights to licence -all- the material in their dataset to you on these terms. This might seem like a theoretical hurdle invented by me, alas it is not, as some of our UK colleagues can testify. > > Simon
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
