Looks like these have all been resolved! Thanks all for your help. Martijn van Exel http://mvexel.github.io/
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 2:38 PM, Martijn van Exel <[email protected]> wrote: > Just ran the overpass query again and we're down to 1421 relations with > underscore network tags, from 2313 yesterday. > > For those interested the query is > > area[name=Canada]->.canada; > relation > ["route"="road"]["network"~"..\_.+"](area.canada); > out; > > This does not give you any geometry. > > Martijn > > Martijn van Exel > http://mvexel.github.io/ > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 5:04 PM, Martijn van Exel <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I created a spreadsheet to track the relations and fixes. It doesn't lend >> itself well to a MapRoulette challenge or I would have done that :) >> >> Includes handy direct JOSM link! >> >> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1O1LGJk6r6gP6NrKYmdAu >> LKsc0vdNcaTH_k0F_Wjwdio/edit?usp=sharing >> >> Let me know if this is workable. >> >> Martijn >> >> Martijn van Exel >> http://mvexel.github.io/ >> >> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 4:21 PM, Denis Carriere <[email protected] >> > wrote: >> >>> I agree with Martjin, those tags should be corrected to *network*=CA:ON >>> >>> Good catch! >>> >>> *~~~~~~* >>> *Denis Carriere* >>> *GIS Software & Systems Specialist* >>> >>> *Twitter: @DenisCarriere <https://twitter.com/DenisCarriere/>* >>> *OSM: DenisCarriere <https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/DenisCarriere>* >>> GitHub: DenisCarriere <https://github.com/DenisCarriere> >>> Email: [email protected] >>> >>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 6:04 PM, Martijn van Exel <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> My mapping colleagues (not me, I only map in my spare time :)) noted >>>> that there are some irregular network tags on highways in Canada. The usual >>>> hierarchical notation[1] is in place in many relations, but we encountered >>>> deviations from that where instead of the colon separator an underscore is >>>> used, so for example instead of CA:ON we see ca_on, and some variations on >>>> that. >>>> >>>> We are happy to (help) clean that up but didn't want to do so without >>>> consulting you. Is there some local convention that we are unaware of? Can >>>> we provide a dump of the affected relation IDs so we can fix them together? >>>> It's about 400 relations in total, mostly in Ontario. >>>> >>>> [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:network#Hierarchical_format >>>> - it has a Canada example! >>>> >>>> Martijn van Exel >>>> http://mvexel.github.io/ >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Talk-ca mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >>>> >>>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
