Weird there was the same thing yesterday in Ottawa with open.canada.ca On Mar 4, 2017 9:39 AM, "Stewart C. Russell" <[email protected]> wrote:
> On 2017-03-04 08:20 AM, Bjenk Ellefsen wrote: > > > > We can follow the same steps and workflow in the future if we > potentially move to another city. > > This is also something municipalities can use in defining their open > data licenses. > > Yup - for that reason, I will be asking the LWG about the licences for > Ontario, Toronto and Toronto Public library (yup, all different). > > For the record: > > 1) LWG's decision on Ottawa doesn't immediately open up all Canadian > open data to be imported into OSM. The LWG, for now at least, plans > to review them on a case by case base. > > 2) If you're wishing to get a new licence approved, the timeline from > approaching the LWG to getting approval was about two months. > Please build that delay into any critical path > > And belated happy Open Data Day! The reason I was late posting this (LWG > gave me access to the draft minutes mid-afternoon) that I was in an > all-day session with Government of Ontario open data people in Toronto. > Government of Ontario has some very committed open data people. > > cheers, > Stewart > > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-ca mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
