There's many of us that are from the local Ottawa area, we will make sure we capture those exceptions. I am sure in the Downtown area we will find some valid trees that are completely within the building (green spaces on top of a roof).
*~~~~~~* *Denis Carriere* *GIS Software & Systems Specialist* On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 8:34 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected] > wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > On 29. Jun 2017, at 14:01, Rory McCann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > When doing an import, it's important that someone does this sort of > > work. That's part of the process of doing an import, to learn more about > > the accuracy of the data you have, and to check how it would look after > > you import it. You shouldn't just presume everything will fit together > > 100%, someone needs to do this sort of analysis. > > > yes, it will give you some indication about obvious or very likely errors, > still there are also trees inside buildings, it is a rare situation, but I > could recall several instances where I've seen it (both, buildings built > around trees/leaving gaps/holes, and trees being planted inside buildings). > > Problems like these are obvious, but there's no indication that the rest > of the trees are more correct, it might be just harder to spot the issues > when the data seems fine on first glance. > > Are you local to the area? I'd look for some trees you know that fell in > the past years and see whether these events are reflected. > > Cheers, > Martin > > > > _______________________________________________ > Imports mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/imports >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
