Pierre,

This is a good idea, and I plan to do it.   My current challenge is to know what things people think "need correction".  I'm starting these discussions to see if there is any consensus before I go writing code.  If you (or anyone else) has ideas, please do post here (or email directly).  Obviously I will not re-build tools that already exist, but rather focus on Canada-specific issues (eg postal code format).

The checks I made for the City Of Ottawa are here: http://matthew.davintech.ca/osm/.  I will be able to re-use some of what I have done for Ottawa, but based on the discussion so far on talk-CA, the list of things that /might/ need correction is less than what the local community in Ottawa might consider as /possible/ issues for correction.

My current employer is in Montréal (previous one was in Joliette) and I regularly work out of Université du Québec en Outaouais so hopefully you'll consider me part of the local community in Quebec, even though I live in Ontario.  :-)


On 2018-03-10 03:27 PM, Pierre Béland wrote:

Pour revenir aux suggestions de Matthew, de façon à impliquer / motiver les communautés locales, ce serait d'offrir les outils et listes d'objets à corriger un peu comme le fait Osmose et autres outils de QA.


_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Reply via email to