My feeling is in this case they need their tags reviewed and then to be pointed back to probably Map Features for those that are not aligned.
It's labour intensive but if they can be turned round then that would give us an active mapper who is involved over the longer term rather than someone who maps for a day. Cheerio John On Thu, 1 Nov 2018, 12:54 pm OSM Volunteer stevea <[email protected] wrote: > Being as gentle (though not local) as I can be, I continue to assert that > our wiki for BC2020 in general and > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Canada/Building_Canada_2020#The_data_that_could_be_mapped > as a specific section IN that wiki (calling attention to these tags, with > hundreds of potential values): > > building > man_made > addr > start_date > entrance > amenity > and others > > might prove very helpful starting points. Often the simple act of reading > OSM's built-in wiki documentation is one of the best, if not THE best > starting point. Of course, talk- mailing lists, our forum and many other > sources of advice/documentation/help are available, too. > > Regards. > SteveA > California > > > On Nov 1, 2018, at 9:40 AM, john whelan <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've discussed the Open Data side with them but I think they could do > with a bit of guidence on the tagging side. Could someone ideally more > local than I point them gently towards map features and more standard > tagging? > > > > I must confess my knowledge of tagging is a little limited to highways > and buildings. > > > > I get the impression they are open to dialog if treated gently. > > > > Thanks John > > _______________________________________________ > > Talk-ca mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
