I can confirm the BIA boundaries are modified very infrequently in New
Brunswick.  I am not aware of any changes during the 10 years in my current
job disseminating GIS data for for the province.

Bernie.

On Wed, Jan 9, 2019, 2:45 PM Matthew Darwin <matt...@mdarwin.ca wrote:

> Hi Harald,
>
> Thanks for your thoughts on this.
>
> From my point of view BIAs are just as (just as not) verifiable on the
> ground as a municipality boundary.  Typically there are gateway signs to
> welcome you to the area, which makes them more concrete then say a census
> area. eg
> https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.331875926798006&lng=-75.892906002273&z=19.36453946996015&pKey=RopOOODg6gMzdE5gHeicfA&focus=photo&x=0.4894869294322967&y=0.5000000000000003&zoom=0
> or
> https://www.mapillary.com/app/?lat=45.39710000000002&lng=-75.7423&z=17&pKey=pEs0qv8z4ielD2jmRpJhqw&focus=photo&x=0.11741761625032077&y=0.5560308877526301&zoom=2.639780018331806
> so just like a municipality boundary there is some physical info, but of
> course doesn't tell you the exact boundary area.
>
> In my experience BIA boundaries don't change much one they are created....
> but of course I am not familiar of what happens outside of Ontario....
> certainly I wouldn't expect them to change more than the boundaries we
> already have in OSM for municipalities and the wards within them which seem
> to change change every decade or so in a growing/changing municipality.
>
>
> On 2019-01-09 12:34 p.m., Harald Kliems wrote:
>
> To me this is a clear case of something that doesn't belong in OSM. It
> sounds like the boundaries aren't verifiable on the ground and may change
> frequently. Therefore any data in OSM would go stale quickly and the only
> verification of accuracy would be to go back to the source.
> Yes, we have deviations from the "verifiable on the ground" rule, but
> we've had similar discussions for census boundaries, ridings/election
> districts, and on the the talk-us list recently about Bureau of Land
> Management boundaries.
>
> For your analysis of businesses within a BIA, you can just download the
> OSM and BIA boundary data separately and do the analysis in the GIS
> application of your choice.
>
>  Harald.
>
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2019 at 6:32 PM Matthew Darwin <matt...@mdarwin.ca> wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> I'm not sure if this applies to other provinces or not, so I thought I
>> would ask here.
>>
>> In Ontario there is a concept of "Business Improvement Area" ("BIA" for
>> short) that has the power to tax businesses within their zone  (see
>> http://www.mah.gov.on.ca/Page1529.aspx for details).
>>
>> I want to tag these in OSM, so then you can run a query to find all
>> businesses within a BIA. Sometimes the boundaries of the BIA are very tight
>> and just cover things that are actual businesses, and sometimes the
>> boundaries of a BIA are very loose and cover lots of area including
>> residential... and when a new business comes up later in that area it
>> automatically is a part of the BIA.
>>
>> I am thinking that the *relation type=boundary, boundary=local_authority
>> *might be applicable here, and define either a Canada specific
>> definition maybe just Ontario, depending if the concept exists elsewhere.
>>
>> I would like to get people's opinion on this idea....  Or please suggest
>> something else.
>>
>>
>> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag%3Aboundary%3Dlocal_authority
>>
>>    - type <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:type>=boundary
>>    <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:type%3Dboundary>
>>    - boundary <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:boundary>=
>>    local_authority
>>    - name <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:name>=*
>>    - local_authority:CA
>>    
>> <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Key:local_authority:FR&action=edit&redlink=1>
>>    =BIA
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Talk-ca mailing list
>> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>>
>
>
> --
> Please use encrypted communication whenever possible!
> Key-ID: 0x34cb93972f186565
>
> _______________________________________________
> Talk-ca mailing list
> Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
>
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
Talk-ca@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca

Reply via email to