I accept the nicest way is to check the data beforehand. Scripting it is fairly simple. Are you suggesting a two stage process of take the data and run the script first then task manager the data to be imported to manually correct the data? My eyesight isn't good enough to pick out none right angled corners so is there some way someone can come up with to feed them into a JOSM todo list?
However we have a fairly large number of building outlines that have already been imported. The issue here is different as extra tags have been added. Can the questionable ones be identified in such a way that a JOSM todo list can be used to correct them rather than throw out all the work that has been done adding tags? I think you are assuming a more top down management arrangement than exists with volunteer Canadian mappers. Thanks John On Sun, 3 Feb 2019 at 15:33, Pierre Béland <[email protected]> wrote: > John > > Oui, je suggère à ceux qui préparent un plan d'importation, de modifier > la donnée avant l'importation. Des critères comme ceux que j'ai présenté > pourraient être utilisés dans un script pour simplifier les polygones qui > sont quasi orthogonaux. > > Pour simplifier la procédue d'import, deux fichiers distincts pourraient > être produits : > > 1. Formes géométriques quasi-orthogonales corrigées - import plus rapide - > mais a voir si problèmes lorsque des bâtiments voisins partagent des nodes. > > 2. Formes géométriques irrégulières - Import avec révision / correction > plus serrée. > > Il reste à ceux qui mènent le projet de faire ces développements > logiciels. Et pourquoi pas, de proposer des outils que les communautés > locales pourront ensuite utiliser. Par contre éviter qu'un petit groupe > importe rapidement les données et ignore le rôle des communautés locales. > > Et l'argument, si tu t'opposes, tu est responsable pour ta communauté, > nous ont fait le reste du pays, à mon avis cela ne tient pas la route. > > Pierre > > > Le dimanche 3 février 2019 14 h 57 min 45 s HNE, john whelan < > [email protected]> a écrit : > > > So you're proposing that a script is run to correct minor deviations in > the remaining data which sounds a reasonable approach to me and would > improve data quality. > > So run the data through the script. Then import and run overpass to pick > out those that need manual adjustment? > > If we do this though then I think we need to stay with the single import > plan rather than have individual import plans popping up that didn't use > the scripts. > > I have no control over the number of mappers importing or the rate at > which they import and I'm not sure how you would mange this other than > having a person identified in the wiki as leading a particular area and > there is provision or rather was I'm not sure what the latest version says. > > Even with smaller import plans there would be nothing to stop one mapper > bringing in building outlines very quickly. > > Cheerio John > > >
_______________________________________________ Talk-ca mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
