I would concur in general but any import needs the agreement of local
mappers and I think we have to define who they are first.
Cheerio John
Danny McDonald wrote on 2019-03-02 7:23 PM:
Just looking at the data for some random areas, it looks like the
quality is comparable to hand-drawn buildings (but not as good as most
municipal data). There are some weirdly rotated and sized buildings,
as well as some missing buildings, there may be other problems in
areas I haven't examined.
A few comments:
- The StatsCan data is of better quality, it should be used instead of
the Microsoft data when possible.
- Existing hand-drawn/imported buildings should not be replaced by the
Microsoft data (except for CanVec buildings, maybe).
- In any import, the bigger provinces should be split into smaller
areas (counties or regions)
DannyMcD
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
--
Sent from Postbox
<https://www.postbox-inc.com/?utm_source=email&utm_medium=siglink&utm_campaign=reach>
_______________________________________________
Talk-ca mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ca
