Hello Tobias, Almost correct:
- The source we're using is the official, canonical government house registry, which is up-to-date pretty much by definition. - The update interval is fairly regular, albeit long (~monthly, see also http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Address_import_from_RUIAN ). - This is one of the reasons adding address points manually is problematic, the other reason is that a building *usually* (but not always!) has two different address numbers (one derived from position in street, the other assigned by an opaque bureaucratic process). I've seen address points with 0-3 numbers assigned...it's complicated. (I have no idea how this works in Slovakia.) Btw, thank you for StreetComplete, it's a great tool :) Cheers, Honza "Piškvor" Martinec Dne 12. 11. 2017 22:29 napsal uživatel "Tobias Zwick" <o...@westnordost.de>: Hi Marián Not sure if I understand you correctly, just to be in the clear: So, you have a source from which you irregularly update the addresses from. That source is also kept up-to-date and that is why it makes little sense for surveyors (be it via StreetComplete or using field papers and JOSM/etc) to add housenumber data and/or is even disruptive. Correct? Regarding Slovakia, so would you say it is the same situation in regards to that an individual survey is not helpful for housenumbers? Cheers Tobias _______________________________________________ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
_______________________________________________ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz
