Matthias Meißer <[email protected]> wrote: >> We've tabled your suggestion, and have moved the status to under >> consideration. Our development team had looked into using it last year. >> However, we decided against it at that time because it would require more >> development effort to render the map, and that its coverage of major >> commercial resorts was sporadic.
Tss! wo sitzen die denn? Ich glaube nicht, dass in den "major commercial resorts" noch groß was zu mappen ist. Grade zu Openpistemap gibt es kommerziell nichts ansatzweise vergleichbares. Wer mag kann ja mal Pistenpläne durchgehen und auf Vollständigkeit prüfen. Ich glaube aber, dass die Karte sogar besser ist als die Statuseinträge unter http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Piste Gruss Sven -- It's easier for our software to compete with Linux when there's piracy than when there's not. (Bill Gates) /me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web _______________________________________________ Talk-de mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
