Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > So in the end I am happy that someone recently coded the > missing relation support for Potlatch2, but given your > statements from previous discussions (as well as you closing > relative tickets with "won't fix") wasn't really encouraging to > think that this has been done in the past few weeks.
What on earth are you on about? Potlatch 2 has full support for nested and ordered relations. Potlatch 2 has _always_ had full support for nested and ordered relations. That is what Tirkon was disputing in his wiki posting to which http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2011-December/090998.html referred; that is what you supported in the follow-up message, http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-de/2011-December/091009.html; and that is what I was correcting. This has absolutely nothing to do with whether Potlatch 2 has an abstraction model for one particular (broken) tagging paradigm, by which tags created in simple mode are applied to a 'containing' multipolygon relation rather than the way itself. That is the subject of your trac tickets. I have already explained why, given the likelihood of a proper area datatype to replace this nasty hack, I will not spend my own time coding that; but suggested: "If you want it to be changed to additionally support tagging the relation, submit a good patch. I will be happy to help with the coding and UI issues for this patch." and again: "if someone else who does come from a land where people use bonkers complicated multipolygons came up with a decent patch, I imagine we'd be very happy to accept it." But I realise that would require you to actually do some work rather than just endlessly, parasitically criticising others' work on the mailing lists. Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Potlatch-and-relation-handling-tp7089701p7089929.html Sent from the Germany mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Talk-de mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
