On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 03:30:04PM +0100, Esben Damgaard wrote: > Den 19-11-2010 14:30, Alexander Hunziker skrev: > >Hi, > > > >sorry to bother everyone with this again, but is this: > > > >http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/83840080/history > > > >not exactly the way we decided NOT to proceed? > It looks like it. The road should be reversed, and have the tags > highway=residential, cycleway:right=track. No need for the extra > way. > Doing it the way Niels Beck did, it's easy to make mistakes. As we > see at the end of Herninggade, a small way with no tags. > This page has some good examples: > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle. This is ref:L2 but as a > track. > > Do people agree?
Yes. -- Morten _______________________________________________ Talk-dk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk
