Hej
Nogle har været i gang med at lave dupletter i Kgs. Lyngby [1]. Jeg ved
ikke om man skal lade dem være eller blanke bygningernes data af?
[1] http://osm.org/go/0NW5nj_vF-
On 06-12-2010 19:08, Morten Kjeldgaard wrote:
On 06/12/2010, at 17.29, Thies Pierdola wrote:
Hi Danmark,
with the new Bing dataset released, I started drawing buildings.
One simple question came up, what do I do with kms/address markers?
1) Leave them as they are?
Yes, please. We would like the OSAK nodes to be updated by a bot in
the future, and moving them/changing their content will only disturb
or complicate that process. If you remove one, it will likely be
recreated by the bot when comes along to that street anyway.
2) Transfer the data to the new buildings and remove the markers?
3) Put them in some kind of relation?
You could duplicate the OSAK information for a building that only
contains a single address, and you could create a relation for
buildings with more then one address. But frankly, I don't see the
point. The address nodes work fine with routing algorithms, and what
else do you need?
On a similar note, I considered assempling streets and address nodes
in a associatedStreet relation, on a systematic level it seems
logical, but again, I fail to see what it should be used for. A lot of
added data and complexity (that needs maintenance) with any real
benefits.
I hope there is some kind of convention about this. For now I leave
them as they are and just draw buildings, as i don't want to mess up
the address data.
That is exactly what we want, AFAIAC :-)
Cheers,
Morten
_______________________________________________
Talk-dk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk
Med venlig hilsen
--
Thomas Bredøl aka Broadbeer
Valby Overdrev 10
DK 3200 Helsinge
+45 4042 3492
http://bredol.tel
_______________________________________________
Talk-dk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-dk
