> > > Question about it: why you cannot select Tartu? It seems to fulfil > > > their criteria for "proper city" (admin_level=8, boundary=administrative)? > > I do no know but using bounding box result is great-looking :) > > http://maposmatic.org/rendered//009951_2010-02-12_09- > 27_Tartukaart.png > > Indeed, I had the very same idea ... now there's two very similar maps. > :) > > To find out why it doesn't want to render many Estonian towns seems to be a > job for analysing the code. At least I also do not yet have a good idea.
My first idea was that maybe it does not like relations, and wants to use simple ways? But I assume Kärdla was also defined as relation? Actually Kärdla seems to be only city name which is selectable there properly, I could not find any other? I traced a bit JSON data what is returned by nominatim. It seems that for other cities it gives point, not boundary region. Maybe there is no centroid point for Kärdla, and there is for other cities and this confuses the Nominatim? Solution/test: remove centroid points for other cities too. Or does anyone needs them once you have the boundary polygon (relation) present? Sounds like redundant data for me. Jaak _______________________________________________ Talk-ee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ee
