Quite interesting. Some numbers are obvious, but others like POI and Place definitions for instance are not to me, could they reveal how they got them? We ignorant Estonians tend to make this kind of comparisons with Scandinavian countries or whole Europe, but smaller scale focus is usually more practical.
These numbers should be divided by number of capita or sq km in principle, but right now it does not matter really, trends are interesting enough anyway. Ps. IMHO it would be much more important to keep eye on community - number of users, new users, active users, returning users, spread of edits of users inspace and time etc. When there is active community then nodes etc will come with with high quantity and quality anyway. I think that OSM is first of all about people, and less about data. Jaak On Tuesday, January 1, 2013, Gints Polis wrote: > Small statistic from our Lithuanian friends :). > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Tomas Straupis <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');>> > Date: 2013/1/1 > Subject: [Talk-lt] Statistika (lt+lv+ee) > To: OSM Talk LT <[email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');>> > > > Sveiki > > Kaip ir žadėjau, štai statistika su tendencijomis: > http://z.samogitian.com/stat/baltic/ > > P.S. Gal dar kažkokius rodiklius yra prasmė stebėti? > > -- > Tomas > > _______________________________________________ > Talk-lt mailing list > [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');> > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-lt > > > > -- > Ginc > -- Jaak Laineste
_______________________________________________ Talk-ee mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ee
